MN vs VYM
Corgi MANGOS ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MN or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MN led over 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 4 | 610 |
| YTD Return | -20.03% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -20.03% | +19.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.45%Best | +11.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 70.2% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -92.2% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,349Best | $17,218 |
| Fund Family | Corgi Strategies, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2011 to Nov 13, 2026 (15 years).
MN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
MN vs VYM Performance
Corgi MANGOS ETF (MN) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MN returned -20.03% while VYM returned +19.62%. Year to date, MN is down 20.03% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.2% compared with 13.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.2% for MN and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MN charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MN currently yields 0.00% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in MN and 602 in VYM, totalling 44.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, MN as of Nov 3, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in MN and 602 in VYM, against full books of 4 and 610.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MN or VYM?
MN has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MN or VYM?
Over the past year MN returned -20.03% vs +19.62% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), MN annualized +7.40% vs +10.58% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MN or VYM?
MN has been the more volatile fund at 70.2% annualized versus 13.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MN -92.2% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both MN and VYM?
MN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MN or VYM?
MN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MN led over 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.