MN vs QQQ
Corgi MANGOS ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MN or QQQ?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MN led over 5Y, QQQ over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $476.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 4 | 312 |
| YTD Return | -20.03% | +11.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | -20.03% | +12.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.45%Best | +12.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 70.2% | 17.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -92.2% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,349Best | $17,765 |
| Fund Family | Corgi Strategies, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2011 to Nov 13, 2026 (15 years).
MN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15 years both funds cover.
MN vs QQQ Performance
Corgi MANGOS ETF (MN) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MN returned -20.03% while QQQ returned +12.28%. Year to date, MN is down 20.03% versus a gain of 11.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.2% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.2% for MN and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MN charges 0.20% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MN currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 16.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings MN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MN, our book for it covers 44.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and MN share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in MN and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 4 and 312.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MN or QQQ?
MN has an expense ratio of 0.20% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MN or QQQ?
Over the past year MN returned -20.03% vs +12.28% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), MN annualized +7.40% vs +18.47% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MN or QQQ?
MN has been the more volatile fund at 70.2% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: MN -92.2% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both MN and QQQ?
MN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MN and QQQ?
At least 16.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings MN also owns. Our book for MN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in MN and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MN or QQQ?
MN yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. MN led over 5Y, QQQ over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.