MSMR vs TBFG
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF vs The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
Which is better, MSMR or TBFG?
Each has led over a different period.
TBFG has a lower expense ratio. MSMR led over the full window, TBFG over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSMR | TBFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.46%Best |
| AUM | $181M | $369M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.98% | 2.48% |
| Holdings | 14 | 49 |
| YTD Return | +2.20% | +7.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.30% | +8.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.45% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 9.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8%Best | -14.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $14,298Best | $13,458 |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 66.5% |
| Fund Family | Aptus Capital Advisors | Brinsmere Fund |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2021 | Jan 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 16, 2024 to Nov 9, 2026 (2.8 years).
MSMR vs TBFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
MSMR vs TBFG Performance
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is an ETF from Aptus Capital Advisors and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is an ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year MSMR returned +2.30% while TBFG returned +8.93%. Year to date, MSMR is up 2.20% versus a gain of 7.27% for TBFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 9.1% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for MSMR and -14.2% for TBFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSMR charges 1.06% per year while TBFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $46 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSMR currently yields 1.98% against 2.48% for TBFG.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of MSMR's money is in holdings TBFG also owns. 0.3% of TBFG's money is in holdings MSMR also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in MSMR and 23 in TBFG, against full books of 14 and 49.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for TBFG that do not appear in our book for MSMR (99.7% of the fund), and 5 for MSMR that do not appear in TBFG (99.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSMR | Weight in TBFG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FXFXXFirst Am Treas Obli-X | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSMR and TBFG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSMR or TBFG?
MSMR has an expense ratio of 1.06% while TBFG charges 0.46%. TBFG is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSMR or TBFG?
Over the past year MSMR returned +2.30% vs +8.93% for TBFG, so TBFG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSMR or TBFG?
MSMR has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 9.1% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: MSMR -9.8% vs TBFG -14.2%.
Should I hold both MSMR and TBFG?
MSMR and TBFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSMR or TBFG?
MSMR yields 1.98% while TBFG yields 2.48%, so TBFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBFG better than MSMR?
TBFG has a lower expense ratio. MSMR led over the full window, TBFG over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.