MSOS vs VTI
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSOS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $837M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -3.34% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.49% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.08% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -33.67% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
MSOS vs VTI Performance
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSOS returned -1.49% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MSOS is down 3.34% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, MSOS compounded at -2.08% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -33.67% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -24.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for MSOS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSOS charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSOS currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSOS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSOS or VTI?
MSOS has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSOS or VTI?
Over the past year MSOS returned -1.49% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MSOS annualized -24.52% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSOS or VTI?
MSOS has been the more volatile fund at 72.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSOS -96.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSOS and VTI?
MSOS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSOS and VTI?
MSOS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSOS or VTI?
MSOS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.