MSOS vs VOO
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSOS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $837M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -8.14% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | -6.38% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.24% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -34.67% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 72.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MSOS vs VOO Performance
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSOS returned -6.38% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, MSOS is down 8.14% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, MSOS compounded at -4.24% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -34.67% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -25.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.3% for MSOS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSOS charges 0.78% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSOS currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MSOS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSOS or VOO?
MSOS has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSOS or VOO?
Over the past year MSOS returned -6.38% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MSOS annualized -25.17% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSOS or VOO?
MSOS has been the more volatile fund at 72.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MSOS -96.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MSOS and VOO?
MSOS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSOS and VOO?
MSOS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSOS or VOO?
MSOS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.