MSTU vs QQQ
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $331M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -69.22% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -95.00% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 164.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MSTU vs QQQ Performance
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MSTU returned -95.00% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MSTU is down 69.22% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 164.7% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.4% for MSTU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTU charges 1.05% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $18 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTU currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MSTU and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTU or QQQ?
MSTU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTU or QQQ?
Over the past year MSTU returned -95.00% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTU annualized -68.74% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTU or QQQ?
MSTU has been the more volatile fund at 164.7% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: MSTU -99.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MSTU and QQQ?
MSTU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTU and QQQ?
MSTU and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTU or QQQ?
MSTU yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.