MUSE vs VOO
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MUSE or VOO?
Long Term High Quality against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUSE | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.77% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 261 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.86% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.34% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.0%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,278 | $13,250Best |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term High Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.8 years).
MUSE vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
MUSE vs VOO Performance
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUSE returned +5.34% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, MUSE is up 3.86% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 3.0% for MUSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.6% for MUSE and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUSE charges 0.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUSE currently yields 7.77% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 116 holdings in MUSE and 505 in VOO, totalling 43.3% and 99.9% of the two funds. That is not enough of MUSE to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, MUSE as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 116 positions we hold weights for in MUSE and 505 in VOO, against full books of 261 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MUSE | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNPCenterpoint Energy Inc 5.95% Apr 01, 2056 | 0.64% | 0.04% | 0.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MUSE and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUSE or VOO?
MUSE has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MUSE or VOO?
Over the past year MUSE returned +5.34% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUSE annualized +6.91% vs +16.92% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MUSE or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 3.0% for MUSE. Worst drawdown: MUSE -3.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both MUSE and VOO?
MUSE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUSE or VOO?
MUSE yields 7.77% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MUSE?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.