MUU vs VTI
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MUU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +435.09% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +2717.01% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 222.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -75.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MUU vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X ETF (MUU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MUU returned +2717.01% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, MUU is up 435.09% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 222.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.1% for MUU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUU charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUU currently yields 1.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MUU and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MUU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MU | 16.84% | 1.79% | 15.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUU or VTI?
MUU has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUU or VTI?
Over the past year MUU returned +2717.01% vs +22.43% for VTI, so MUU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUU annualized +482.67% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUU or VTI?
MUU has been the more volatile fund at 222.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MUU -75.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MUU and VTI?
MUU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUU and VTI?
MUU and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUU or VTI?
MUU yields 1.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MUU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.