MYCN vs QQQ
State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
MYCN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. MYCN offers more diversification with 117 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MYCN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $8M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.07% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 117 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.40% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.90% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MYCN vs QQQ Performance
State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MYCN returned +2.90% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, MYCN is down 0.40% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.4% for MYCN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.6% for MYCN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MYCN charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MYCN currently yields 5.07% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MYCN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MYCN or QQQ?
MYCN has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. MYCN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MYCN or QQQ?
Over the past year MYCN returned +2.90% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MYCN annualized +2.80% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MYCN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.4% for MYCN. Worst drawdown: MYCN -4.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MYCN and QQQ?
MYCN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MYCN and QQQ?
MYCN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MYCN or QQQ?
MYCN yields 5.07% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MYCN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.