NAC vs VOO
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NAC or VOO?
Municipal California against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NAC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.80% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 346 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -6.33% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.27% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.22% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.29% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,906 | $18,944Best |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal California | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 26, 1999 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 22, 2026 (16 years).
NAC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NAC vs VOO Performance
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NAC returned -0.27% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, NAC is down 6.33% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, NAC compounded at +9.22% per year against +23.04% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -2.29% and +13.63% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs +0.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.9% for NAC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.7% for NAC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NAC charges 3.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $379 vs $3 annually, a gap of $376 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NAC currently yields 7.80% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in NAC and 494 in VOO, totalling 0.4% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 61 days apart, NAC as of May 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in NAC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 346 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NAC and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NAC or VOO?
NAC has an expense ratio of 3.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $376 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NAC or VOO?
Over the past year NAC returned -0.27% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), NAC annualized +0.06% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NAC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.9% for NAC. Worst drawdown: NAC -38.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NAC and VOO?
NAC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NAC or VOO?
NAC yields 7.80% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NAC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.