NCLD vs VTI
Roundhill Neocloud ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NCLD or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NCLD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 16 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.08% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NCLD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NCLD vs VTI Performance
Roundhill Neocloud ETF (NCLD) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NCLD is up 7.08% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NCLD charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings NCLD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NCLD, our book for it covers 60.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
9 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in NCLD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 16 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NCLD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRWVCoreweave, Inc. | 5.73% | 0.04% | 5.69% |
| GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc Class A | 5.47% | 0.01% | 5.46% |
| WULFTerawulf Inc | 4.29% | 0.01% | 4.28% |
| APLDApplied Digital Corp | 4.24% | 0.01% | 4.23% |
| RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. | 3.94% | 0.01% | 3.93% |
| CIFRCipher Mining Inc | 3.63% | 0.01% | 3.62% |
| CORZCore Scientific Inc Common Stock | 3.16% | 0.01% | 3.15% |
| CLSKCleanspark Inc | 1.70% | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| KEELKeel Infrastructure Corp. | 1.10% | 0.00% | 1.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NCLD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NCLD or VTI?
NCLD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Is VTI better than NCLD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.