NDAA vs VTI
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDAA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.44% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.27% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Ned Davis Research | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
NDAA vs VTI Performance
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) is a ETF from Ned Davis Research and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDAA returned +20.27% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, NDAA is up 12.44% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 10.0% for NDAA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.5% for NDAA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDAA charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDAA currently yields 2.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NDAA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDAA or VTI?
NDAA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NDAA or VTI?
Over the past year NDAA returned +20.27% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDAA annualized +14.21% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NDAA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 10.0% for NDAA. Worst drawdown: NDAA -13.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NDAA and VTI?
NDAA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NDAA and VTI?
NDAA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDAA or VTI?
NDAA yields 2.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NDAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.