NDAA vs VYM
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDAA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $4M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.47% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +11.55% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.41% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Ned Davis Research | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NDAA vs VYM Performance
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) is a ETF from Ned Davis Research and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDAA returned +21.41% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, NDAA is up 11.55% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 9.9% for NDAA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.5% for NDAA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDAA charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDAA currently yields 2.47% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NDAA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 567 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDAA or VYM?
NDAA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NDAA or VYM?
Over the past year NDAA returned +21.41% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDAA annualized +13.84% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NDAA or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 9.9% for NDAA. Worst drawdown: NDAA -13.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NDAA and VYM?
NDAA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NDAA and VYM?
NDAA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 567 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDAA or VYM?
NDAA yields 2.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.