NDAA vs VYM
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NDAA or VYM?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDAA | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $186M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 10 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +9.74% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.07% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.8%Best | 10.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.5%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,405 | $12,648Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.3% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Ned Davis Research | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 17, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
NDAA vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
NDAA vs VYM Performance
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) is an ETF from Ned Davis Research and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDAA returned +14.07% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, NDAA is up 9.74% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.9% compared with 9.8% for NDAA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.5% for NDAA and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDAA charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDAA currently yields 2.42% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 25 holdings in NDAA and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in NDAA and 557 in VYM, against full books of 10 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 25 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 528 positions NDAA does not, 97.1% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.35%, JPM 3.82%, XOM 2.63%, JNJ 2.51%, CSCO 1.86%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NDAA and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDAA or VYM?
NDAA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NDAA or VYM?
Over the past year NDAA returned +14.07% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDAA annualized +12.01% vs +13.16% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NDAA or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.9% annualized versus 9.8% for NDAA. Worst drawdown: NDAA -13.5% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both NDAA and VYM?
NDAA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDAA or VYM?
NDAA yields 2.42% while VYM yields 2.22%, so NDAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NDAA?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.