NEBX vs VTI

NEBX vs VTI

Which is better, NEBX or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNEBXVTI
Expense Ratio1.30%0.03%Best
AUM$151M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings103,543
YTD Return-24.02%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-46.00%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)204.1%13.1%Best
Max Drawdown-92.1%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$5,045$11,786Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 8, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1 years).

NEBX vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NEBX vs VTI Performance

Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NEBX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NEBX returned -46.00% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, NEBX is down 24.02% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NEBX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 204.1% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -92.1% for NEBX and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NEBX charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NEBX currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NEBX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NEBXVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NEBX or VTI?

NEBX has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NEBX or VTI?

Over the past year NEBX returned -46.00% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NEBX annualized -49.55% vs +17.86% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NEBX or VTI?

NEBX has been the more volatile fund at 204.1% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NEBX -92.1% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both NEBX and VTI?

NEBX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NEBX or VTI?

NEBX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NEBX?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.