NEMD vs VXUS
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NEMD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $138M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.83% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 276 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.98% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.93% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 11, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NEMD vs VXUS Performance
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NEMD returned +10.93% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, NEMD is up 3.98% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.5% for NEMD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.4% for NEMD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NEMD charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NEMD currently yields 5.83% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NEMD and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7917 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NEMD | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARGENT 4.125 07/09/3 | 1.85% | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| ARGENT 3.5 07/09/41 | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NEMD or VXUS?
NEMD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NEMD or VXUS?
Over the past year NEMD returned +10.93% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NEMD annualized +10.94% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NEMD or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.5% for NEMD. Worst drawdown: NEMD -4.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NEMD and VXUS?
NEMD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NEMD and VXUS?
NEMD and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7917 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NEMD or VXUS?
NEMD yields 5.83% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so NEMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.