NFLW vs SCHD
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NFLW | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $7M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 80.59% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -25.94% | +28.63% | |
| 1Y Return | -48.63% | +32.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.3% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NFLW vs SCHD Performance
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NFLW returned -48.63% while SCHD returned +32.53%. Year to date, NFLW is down 25.94% versus a gain of 28.63% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.3% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for NFLW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NFLW charges 1.00% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $6 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NFLW currently yields 80.59% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NFLW and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NFLW or SCHD?
NFLW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NFLW or SCHD?
Over the past year NFLW returned -48.63% vs +32.53% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NFLW annualized -43.30% vs +11.63% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NFLW or SCHD?
NFLW has been the more volatile fund at 38.3% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NFLW -61.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NFLW and SCHD?
NFLW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NFLW and SCHD?
NFLW and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NFLW or SCHD?
NFLW yields 80.59% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so NFLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.