IVV vs NFLW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NFLW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 80.59% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -25.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -48.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 38.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -61.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 18, 2025 |
IVV vs NFLW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while NFLW returned -48.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 25.99% for NFLW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -61.5% for NFLW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NFLW charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 80.59% for NFLW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NFLW share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NFLW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFLX | 0.45% | 12.84% | 12.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NFLW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NFLW charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NFLW?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -48.67% for NFLW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -43.26% for NFLW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NFLW?
NFLW has been the more volatile fund at 38.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NFLW -61.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and NFLW?
IVV and NFLW have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NFLW?
IVV and NFLW share 1 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NFLW?
IVV yields 1.10% while NFLW yields 80.59%, so NFLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.