NFLW vs VTI
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NFLW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 80.59% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -26.67% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -48.73% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
NFLW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NFLW returned -48.73% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, NFLW is down 26.67% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for NFLW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NFLW charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NFLW currently yields 80.59% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NFLW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NFLW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFLX | 12.84% | 0.41% | 12.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NFLW or VTI?
NFLW has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NFLW or VTI?
Over the past year NFLW returned -48.73% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NFLW annualized -43.63% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NFLW or VTI?
NFLW has been the more volatile fund at 37.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NFLW -61.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NFLW and VTI?
NFLW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NFLW and VTI?
NFLW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NFLW or VTI?
NFLW yields 80.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NFLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.