NISM vs VOO
NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NISM or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NISM is less concentrated, with 21.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NISM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.24% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 91 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +0.74% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.7%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | New York Life Investment Management LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 13, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NISM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NISM vs VOO Performance
NYLI International Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (NISM) is an ETF from New York Life Investment Management LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NISM is up 0.74% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NISM charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NISM currently yields 0.24% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 89 holdings in NISM and 505 in VOO, totalling 99.9% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, NISM as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in NISM and 505 in VOO, against full books of 91 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NISM (99.4% of the fund), and 1 for NISM that do not appear in VOO (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NISM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NISM or VOO?
NISM has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, NISM or VOO?
NISM yields 0.24% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NISM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NISM is less concentrated, with 21.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.