NMBL vs QQQ
NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NMBL or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NMBL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.99% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 54 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +2.51% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.50% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 22.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.1%Best | -14.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,267 | $10,995Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 46.9%Best |
| Fund Family | NovaTide | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
NMBL vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
NMBL vs QQQ Performance
NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) is an ETF from NovaTide and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NMBL returned +3.50% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, NMBL is up 2.51% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 9.9% for NMBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.1% for NMBL and -14.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NMBL charges 1.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $199 vs $18 annually, a gap of $181 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NMBL currently yields 0.90% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 20 holdings in NMBL and 101 in QQQ, totalling 96.8% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in NMBL and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 54 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NMBL (97.2% of the fund), and 11 for NMBL that do not appear in QQQ (21.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NMBL and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NMBL or QQQ?
NMBL has an expense ratio of 1.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $181 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NMBL or QQQ?
Over the past year NMBL returned +3.50% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), NMBL annualized +2.67% vs +9.95% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NMBL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 9.9% for NMBL. Worst drawdown: NMBL -8.1% vs QQQ -14.8%.
Should I hold both NMBL and QQQ?
NMBL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NMBL or QQQ?
NMBL yields 0.90% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so NMBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NMBL?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.