NMBL vs VXUS
NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, NMBL or VXUS?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NMBL | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.99% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 43 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +6.27% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.52% | +19.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.46% |
| Fund Family | NovaTide | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NMBL vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NMBL vs VXUS Performance
NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) is an ETF from NovaTide and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NMBL returned +6.52% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, NMBL is up 6.27% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NMBL charges 1.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $199 vs $5 annually, a gap of $194 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NMBL currently yields 0.86% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in NMBL and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 99.9% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NMBL and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 43 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NMBL and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NMBL or VXUS?
NMBL has an expense ratio of 1.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $194 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NMBL or VXUS?
Over the past year NMBL returned +6.52% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NMBL or VXUS?
NMBL yields 0.86% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than NMBL?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.