NRES vs SCHD
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NRES delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NRES | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $34M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.67% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +16.42% | +25.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.91% | +32.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NRES vs SCHD Performance
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NRES returned +36.91% while SCHD returned +32.62%. Year to date, NRES is up 16.42% versus a gain of 25.62% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NRES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.5% for NRES and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NRES charges 0.45% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $6 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NRES currently yields 2.67% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NRES and SCHD share 4 holdings out of 152 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NRES or SCHD?
NRES has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NRES or SCHD?
Over the past year NRES returned +36.91% vs +32.62% for SCHD, so NRES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NRES annualized +17.27% vs +11.47% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NRES or SCHD?
NRES has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NRES -21.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NRES and SCHD?
NRES and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NRES and SCHD?
NRES and SCHD share 4 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 152 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NRES or SCHD?
NRES yields 2.67% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.