IVV vs NRES
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NRES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NRES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.67% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +16.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +35.51% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 27, 2024 |
IVV vs NRES Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while NRES returned +35.51%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 16.33% for NRES.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NRES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.5% for NRES. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NRES charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.67% for NRES.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NRES share 24 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NRES?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NRES charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NRES?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +35.51% for NRES, so NRES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +17.21% for NRES. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NRES?
NRES has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NRES -21.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and NRES?
IVV and NRES have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NRES?
IVV and NRES share 24 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NRES?
IVV yields 1.09% while NRES yields 2.67%, so NRES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.