NUDM vs QQQ
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. NUDM offers more diversification with 153 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUDM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $739M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.94% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 153 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.18% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.18% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.69% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.33% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 6, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
NUDM vs QQQ Performance
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) is a ETF from Nuveen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NUDM returned +21.18% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, NUDM is up 13.18% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, NUDM compounded at +19.69% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.33% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for NUDM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.0% for NUDM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUDM charges 0.27% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUDM currently yields 4.94% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
NUDM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 251 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUDM or QQQ?
NUDM has an expense ratio of 0.27% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUDM or QQQ?
Over the past year NUDM returned +21.18% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), NUDM annualized +8.86% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUDM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for NUDM. Worst drawdown: NUDM -32.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both NUDM and QQQ?
NUDM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUDM and QQQ?
NUDM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 251 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUDM or QQQ?
NUDM yields 4.94% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NUDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.