NVD vs SCHD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $97M | $112.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.95% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | -41.98% | +27.60% | |
| 1Y Return | -56.99% | +29.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -78.12% | +16.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 61.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.2% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NVD vs SCHD Performance
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NVD returned -56.99% while SCHD returned +29.63%. Year to date, NVD is down 41.98% versus a gain of 27.60% for SCHD.
Over three years, NVD compounded at -78.12% per year against +16.43% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.54% annualized vs -78.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.2% for NVD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVD charges 1.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $6 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVD currently yields 16.95% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NVD and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVD or SCHD?
NVD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $129 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NVD or SCHD?
Over the past year NVD returned -56.99% vs +29.63% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NVD annualized -78.40% vs +11.54% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NVD or SCHD?
NVD has been the more volatile fund at 61.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NVD -99.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NVD and SCHD?
NVD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NVD and SCHD?
NVD and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVD or SCHD?
NVD yields 16.95% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so NVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.