NVD vs VOO
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NVD or VOO?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.66, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 21.46% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 1 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -46.70% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | -56.14% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -80.05% | +22.72%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.9% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $87 | $18,322Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 22, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.1 years).
NVD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
NVD vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVD returned -56.14% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, NVD is down 46.70% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, NVD compounded at -80.05% per year against +22.72% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.9% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.66. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVD charges 1.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVD currently yields 21.46% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NVD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVD or VOO?
NVD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NVD or VOO?
Over the past year NVD returned -56.14% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NVD or VOO?
NVD has been the more volatile fund at 60.9% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO.
Should I hold both NVD and VOO?
NVD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.66, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVD or VOO?
NVD yields 21.46% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NVD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.66, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.