NVD vs VTI

NVD vs VTI

Which is better, NVD or VTI?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.64, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVDVTI
Expense Ratio1.35%0.03%Best
AUM$69M$666.9B
Dividend Yield21.46%1.03%
Holdings13,543
YTD Return-46.56%+13.60%Best
1Y Return-56.39%+18.17%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-80.09%+23.04%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.14%
Volatility (annualized)60.9%13.2%Best
Max Drawdown--19.3%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$88$18,168Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 21, 2023May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 22, 2023 to Sep 25, 2026 (3.1 years).

NVD vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

NVD vs VTI Performance

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVD returned -56.39% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, NVD is down 46.56% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.

Over three years, NVD compounded at -80.09% per year against +23.04% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.9% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.64. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVD charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVD currently yields 21.46% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVD or VTI?

NVD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVD or VTI?

Over the past year NVD returned -56.39% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVD or VTI?

NVD has been the more volatile fund at 60.9% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI.

Should I hold both NVD and VTI?

NVD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.64, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVD or VTI?

NVD yields 21.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so NVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than NVD?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.64, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.