NVD vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NVD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $97M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.95% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -45.70% | +12.74% | |
| 1Y Return | -59.75% | +20.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -78.57% | +20.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
NVD vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NVD returned -59.75% while VTI returned +20.66%. Year to date, NVD is down 45.70% versus a gain of 12.74% for VTI.
Over three years, NVD compounded at -78.57% per year against +20.69% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs -78.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.2% for NVD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NVD charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVD currently yields 16.95% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NVD and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NVD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | -200.53% | 6.32% | 206.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NVD or VTI?
NVD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $132 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NVD or VTI?
Over the past year NVD returned -59.75% vs +20.66% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), NVD annualized -78.84% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NVD or VTI?
NVD has been the more volatile fund at 60.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NVD -99.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NVD and VTI?
NVD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NVD and VTI?
NVD and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NVD or VTI?
NVD yields 16.95% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.