OAKG vs SCHD
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, OAKG or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKG | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 56 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +2.77% | +21.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.48% |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.4%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
OAKG vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OAKG vs SCHD Performance
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, OAKG is up 2.77% versus a gain of 21.99% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKG charges 0.62% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $6 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKG currently yields 0.04% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of OAKG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings OAKG also owns.
SCHD and OAKG share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OAKG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 56 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for OAKG (96.0% of the fund), and 24 for OAKG that do not appear in SCHD (51.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OAKG | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.90% | 3.94% | 3.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OAKG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKG or SCHD?
OAKG has an expense ratio of 0.62% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKG and SCHD?
3.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings OAKG also owns. 3.9% of SCHD's is in holdings OAKG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OAKG and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKG or SCHD?
OAKG yields 0.04% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than OAKG?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.