OAKG vs SPY

OAKG vs SPY

Which is better, OAKG or SPY?

SPY costs less.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: OAKG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOAKGSPY
Expense Ratio0.62%0.09%Best
AUM$39M$814.4B
Dividend Yield0.04%1.01%
Holdings56505
YTD Return+8.02%+13.78%Best
1Y Return-+21.44%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.38%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Top 10 Weight31.2%Best38.0%
Fund FamilyOakmark FundsState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 11, 2025Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

OAKG vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

OAKG vs SPY Performance

Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, OAKG is up 8.02% versus a gain of 13.78% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OAKG charges 0.62% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $9 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKG currently yields 0.04% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

OAKG already in SPY43.4%
SPY already in OAKG8.4%

43.4% of OAKG's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 8.4% of SPY's money is in holdings OAKG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OAKG and 504 in SPY, against full books of 56 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 476 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for OAKG (91.1% of the fund), and 5 for OAKG that do not appear in SPY (10.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OAKGWeight in SPYDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A1.66%3.33%1.67%
ABNBAirbnb Inc4.06%0.09%3.97%
IQVIqvia Holdings Inc4.01%0.06%3.95%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity3.04%0.23%2.81%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.09%1.94%0.85%
SYYSysco Corp2.68%0.06%2.62%
ELVElevance Health Inc2.50%0.12%2.38%
ICEInternational Exchange, Inc.2.40%0.13%2.27%
WTW:LNWtw2.47%0.05%2.42%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv2.34%0.12%2.22%

43.4% of OAKG is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

OAKGSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OAKG or SPY?

OAKG has an expense ratio of 0.62% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between OAKG and SPY?

43.4% of OAKG's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 8.4% of SPY's is in holdings OAKG also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OAKG and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, OAKG or SPY?

OAKG yields 0.04% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than OAKG?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.