IVV vs OAKG

IVV vs OAKG

Which is better, IVV or OAKG?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: OAKG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVOAKG
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.62%
AUM$876.4B$39M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.04%
Holdings50856
YTD Return+13.32%Best+2.77%
1Y Return+17.08%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.72%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.20%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%31.4%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Oakmark Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 11, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs OAKG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs OAKG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a gain of 2.77% for OAKG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while OAKG charges 0.62%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $62 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.04% for OAKG.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in OAKG8.2%
OAKG already in IVV37.6%

8.2% of IVV's money is in holdings OAKG also owns. 37.6% of OAKG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

19 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in OAKG, against full books of 508 and 56.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 6 positions for OAKG that do not appear in our book for IVV (14.6% of the fund), and 463 for IVV that do not appear in OAKG (90.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in OAKGDifference
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%1.60%1.40%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity0.32%3.91%3.59%
ABNBAirbnb Inc0.12%3.99%3.87%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.17%0.73%
SYYSysco Corp0.06%2.63%2.57%
ELVElevance Health Inc0.13%2.50%2.37%
ICEInternational Exchange, Inc.0.14%2.38%2.24%
KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us)0.07%2.36%2.29%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv0.12%2.29%2.17%
BDXBecton Dickinson And Co.0.08%2.27%2.19%

37.6% of OAKG is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVOAKG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or OAKG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OAKG charges 0.62%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OAKG?

37.6% of OAKG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 37.6% of OAKG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in OAKG.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OAKG?

IVV yields 1.06% while OAKG yields 0.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OAKG better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. OAKG is less concentrated, with 31.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.