OAKI vs VXUS
Oakmark International Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, OAKI or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKI | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $87M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 55 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +2.99% | +14.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.00% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.91% |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
OAKI vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OAKI vs VXUS Performance
Oakmark International Large Cap ETF (OAKI) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, OAKI is up 2.99% versus a gain of 14.48% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKI charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKI currently yields 0.04% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 39.5% of OAKI's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, OAKI as of Aug 19, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAKI and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 55 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OAKI | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUNBSunbelt Rentals | 3.38% | 0.07% | 3.31% |
| LVMH:PALVMH | 2.93% | 0.30% | 2.63% |
| ULVR:LNUlvr Ln Unilever Plc | 2.76% | 0.28% | 2.48% |
| CPG:LNCompass Group Plc /Gbp/ | 2.91% | 0.12% | 2.79% |
| RKT:LNReckitt Benckiser Group PLC Ord Gbp0.10 | 2.76% | 0.09% | 2.67% |
| PRX:ASProsus N V | 2.61% | 0.12% | 2.49% |
| DSV:CODsv A/s | 2.61% | 0.10% | 2.51% |
| PUBP:PAPublicis Groupe Sedol 4380429 | 2.46% | 0.05% | 2.41% |
| ASRNL:ASAsr Nederland Nv | 2.32% | 0.03% | 2.29% |
| 6273:JPSMC Corporation | 2.11% | 0.05% | 2.06% |
39.5% of OAKI is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKI or VXUS?
OAKI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKI and VXUS?
At least 39.5% of OAKI's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAKI and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKI or VXUS?
OAKI yields 0.04% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than OAKI?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.