OAKI vs VOO

OAKI vs VOO

Which is better, OAKI or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. OAKI is less concentrated, with 31.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: OAKI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOAKIVOO
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$87M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.04%1.04%
Holdings55509
YTD Return+2.99%+12.50%Best
1Y Return-+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight31.9%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyOakmark FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 11, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

OAKI vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

OAKI vs VOO Performance

Oakmark International Large Cap ETF (OAKI) is an ETF from Oakmark Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, OAKI is up 2.99% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OAKI charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKI currently yields 0.04% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

OAKI already in VOO2.0%
VOO already in OAKI1.1%

2.0% of OAKI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.1% of VOO's money is in holdings OAKI also owns.

OAKI and VOO share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, OAKI as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

5 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAKI and 505 in VOO, against full books of 55 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 491 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for OAKI (98.3% of the fund), and 5 for OAKI that do not appear in VOO (9.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OAKIWeight in VOODifference
MAMastercard Inc0.36%0.64%0.28%
MDLZMondelez International Inc. Class A0.70%0.12%0.58%
BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc.0.30%0.21%0.09%
NKENike Inc0.36%0.08%0.28%
WATWaters Corp.0.26%0.06%0.20%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of OAKI and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

OAKIVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OAKI or VOO?

OAKI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between OAKI and VOO?

2.0% of OAKI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.1% of VOO's is in holdings OAKI also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OAKI and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, OAKI or VOO?

OAKI yields 0.04% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than OAKI?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. OAKI is less concentrated, with 31.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.