OEFA vs SPY
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, OEFA or SPY?
SPY has been ahead.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. OEFA is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OEFA | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $37M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 51 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +4.20% | +10.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.55% | +15.52%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.53% |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
OEFA vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OEFA vs SPY Performance
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% while SPY returned +15.52%. Year to date, OEFA is up 4.20% versus a gain of 10.96% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OEFA charges 0.48% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $9 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OEFA currently yields 1.44% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in OEFA and 504 in SPY, totalling 98.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OEFA and 504 in SPY, against full books of 51 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for OEFA (99.3% of the fund), and 1 for OEFA that do not appear in SPY (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OEFA and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OEFA or SPY?
OEFA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OEFA or SPY?
Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% vs +15.52% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OEFA or SPY?
OEFA yields 1.44% while SPY yields 0.98%, so OEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than OEFA?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. OEFA is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.