OEFA vs VTI
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OEFA or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OEFA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $37M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.20% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.55% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
OEFA vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OEFA vs VTI Performance
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, OEFA is up 4.20% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OEFA charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OEFA currently yields 1.44% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of OEFA's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OEFA and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for OEFA (97.4% of the fund), and 0 for OEFA that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OEFA | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSLCsl Ltd. - Adr | 0.70% | 0.02% | 0.68% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OEFA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OEFA or VTI?
OEFA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OEFA or VTI?
Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OEFA or VTI?
OEFA yields 1.44% while VTI yields 1.03%, so OEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OEFA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.