OEFA vs QQQ
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, OEFA or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. OEFA is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OEFA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $37M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 51 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +4.20% | +15.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.55% | +19.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.93% |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
OEFA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OEFA vs QQQ Performance
O Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% while QQQ returned +19.78%. Year to date, OEFA is up 4.20% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OEFA charges 0.48% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $18 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OEFA currently yields 1.44% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in OEFA and 102 in QQQ, totalling 98.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in OEFA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 51 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for OEFA (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for OEFA that do not appear in QQQ (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OEFA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OEFA or QQQ?
OEFA has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OEFA or QQQ?
Over the past year OEFA returned +5.55% vs +19.78% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OEFA or QQQ?
OEFA yields 1.44% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so OEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than OEFA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. OEFA is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.