OIA vs VYM

OIA vs VYM

Which is better, OIA or VYM?

Municipal Bond against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOIAVYM
Expense Ratio2.41%0.04%Best
AUM$1,753.44$81.6B
Dividend Yield5.79%2.22%
Holdings239613
YTD Return+2.13%+13.15%Best
1Y Return+4.28%+17.82%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+2.89%+17.99%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-1.11%+12.16%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.7%14.5%Best
Max Drawdown-58.7%Best-58.8%
$10,000 over 5 years$9,457$17,750Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryTax PreferredEquity
StyleMunicipal BondLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 19, 1988Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.8 years).

OIA vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.

OIA vs VYM Performance

Invesco Municipal Income Opportunities Trust (OIA) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OIA returned +4.28% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, OIA is up 2.13% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.

Over three years, OIA compounded at +2.89% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -1.11% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs -0.80%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OIA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.7% for OIA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OIA charges 2.41% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $241 vs $4 annually, a gap of $237 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OIA currently yields 5.79% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of OIA and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

OIAVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OIA or VYM?

OIA has an expense ratio of 2.41% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $237 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, OIA or VYM?

Over the past year OIA returned +4.28% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), OIA annualized -0.80% vs +6.91% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, OIA or VYM?

OIA has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: OIA -58.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both OIA and VYM?

OIA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, OIA or VYM?

OIA yields 5.79% while VYM yields 2.22%, so OIA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than OIA?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.