ONEV vs SCHD
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, ONEV or SCHD?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ONEV is less concentrated, with 9.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONEV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.79% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 452 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +9.91% | +25.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.02% | +27.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.56% | +15.74%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.17% | +9.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.2% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,809 | $16,025Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2015 to Sep 11, 2026 (10.8 years).
ONEV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
ONEV vs SCHD Performance
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ONEV returned +10.02% while SCHD returned +27.61%. Year to date, ONEV is up 9.91% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.
Over three years, ONEV compounded at +12.56% per year against +15.74% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.17% and +9.89% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.42% annualized vs +9.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONEV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.9% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.2% for ONEV and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONEV charges 0.20% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEV currently yields 1.79% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
9.1% of ONEV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 17.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings ONEV also owns.
SCHD and ONEV share little of their money.
31 positions in common, counted across the 449 positions we hold weights for in ONEV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 452 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 67 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ONEV (82.9% of the fund), and 401 for ONEV that do not appear in SCHD (88.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ONEV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 0.72% | 2.31% | 1.59% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.43% | 1.88% | 1.45% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.37% | 1.47% | 1.10% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 0.36% | 1.38% | 1.02% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 0.60% | 0.96% | 0.36% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.76% | 0.64% | 0.12% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.27% | 1.00% | 0.73% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Group Inc | 0.68% | 0.58% | 0.10% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.26% | 0.87% | 0.61% |
| GISGeneral Mills Inc. | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ONEV and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONEV or SCHD?
ONEV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ONEV or SCHD?
Over the past year ONEV returned +10.02% vs +27.61% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ONEV annualized +9.54% vs +11.42% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ONEV or SCHD?
ONEV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.9% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ONEV -40.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ONEV and SCHD?
ONEV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ONEV and SCHD?
17.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings ONEV also owns. 17.0% of SCHD's is in holdings ONEV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 449 positions we hold weights for in ONEV and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONEV or SCHD?
ONEV yields 1.79% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than ONEV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ONEV is less concentrated, with 9.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.