OOQB vs VTI
One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OOQB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $696,442.48 | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -20.22% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.78% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Volatility Shares, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
OOQB vs VTI Performance
One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) is a ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OOQB returned +9.78% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, OOQB is down 20.22% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OOQB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for OOQB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OOQB charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OOQB currently yields 13.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OOQB or VTI?
OOQB has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OOQB or VTI?
Over the past year OOQB returned +9.78% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), OOQB annualized -26.16% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OOQB or VTI?
OOQB has been the more volatile fund at 43.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OOQB -53.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OOQB and VTI?
OOQB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, OOQB or VTI?
OOQB yields 13.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so OOQB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.