OVQ vs XQQI
Overlay Shares Nasdaq 100 Income ETF vs NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
Which is better, OVQ or XQQI?
OVQ costs less.
OVQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OVQ | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $33M | $402M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 16.85% |
| Holdings | 2 | 213 |
| YTD Return | -3.77% | +3.50%Best |
| Fund Family | Overlay Shares | NEOS |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
OVQ vs XQQI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OVQ vs XQQI Performance
Overlay Shares Nasdaq 100 Income ETF (OVQ) is an ETF from Overlay Shares and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, OVQ is down 3.77% versus a gain of 3.50% for XQQI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OVQ charges 0.97% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $98 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OVQ currently yields 0.00% against 16.85% for XQQI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in OVQ and 101 in XQQI, totalling 100.6% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in OVQ and 101 in XQQI, against full books of 2 and 213.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 2 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
XQQI holds 95 positions OVQ does not, 98.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.39%, AAPL 7.91%, MSFT 6.25%, MU 4.46%, AMZN 4.32%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OVQ and XQQI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OVQ or XQQI?
OVQ has an expense ratio of 0.97% while XQQI charges 0.98%. OVQ is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, OVQ or XQQI?
OVQ yields 0.00% while XQQI yields 16.85%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XQQI better than OVQ?
OVQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.