OVT vs QQQ
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OVT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $62M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.08% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -0.98% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.04% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.39% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.59% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Overlay Shares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
OVT vs QQQ Performance
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) is a ETF from Overlay Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year OVT returned -0.04% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, OVT is down 0.98% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, OVT compounded at +5.39% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.1% for OVT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.6% for OVT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OVT charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OVT currently yields 7.08% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
OVT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OVT or QQQ?
OVT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OVT or QQQ?
Over the past year OVT returned -0.04% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), OVT annualized +1.89% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OVT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.1% for OVT. Worst drawdown: OVT -13.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both OVT and QQQ?
OVT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OVT and QQQ?
OVT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OVT or QQQ?
OVT yields 7.08% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so OVT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.