PBD vs VTI
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PBD or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PBD is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $185M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 124 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.25% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.22% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.81% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.29% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.3% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,488 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.1%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2007 to Sep 25, 2026 (19.3 years).
PBD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.3 years both funds cover.
PBD vs VTI Performance
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBD returned +14.22% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, PBD is up 2.25% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, PBD compounded at +5.81% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -8.29% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.17% annualized vs -1.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.3% for PBD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBD charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBD currently yields 1.71% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
21.4% of PBD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings PBD also owns.
PBD and VTI share little of their money.
24 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in PBD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 124 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,139 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PBD (97.2% of the fund), and 5 for PBD that do not appear in VTI (3.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PBD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATKRAtkore International Group Inc | 1.36% | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| ITRIItron Inc | 1.32% | 0.01% | 1.31% |
| RIVNRivian Automotive | 1.23% | 0.02% | 1.21% |
| DARDarling Ingredients, Inc. | 1.17% | 0.01% | 1.16% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 1.05% | 0.03% | 1.02% |
| HASIHa Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc | 1.06% | 0.01% | 1.05% |
| LFUSLittelfuse Inc | 0.99% | 0.02% | 0.97% |
| OLEDUniversal Display Corp | 1.00% | 0.00% | 1.00% |
| CNMCore & Main Lp 144a | 0.99% | 0.01% | 0.98% |
| FSLRFirst Solar, Inc | 0.96% | 0.03% | 0.93% |
21.4% of PBD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBD or VTI?
PBD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBD or VTI?
Over the past year PBD returned +14.22% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PBD annualized -1.47% vs +9.17% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBD or VTI?
PBD has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PBD -79.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PBD and VTI?
PBD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBD and VTI?
21.4% of PBD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings PBD also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in PBD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBD or VTI?
PBD yields 1.71% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PBD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PBD is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.