PBD vs VTI
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PBD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $186M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.25% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.40% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.67% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.33% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
PBD vs VTI Performance
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBD returned +36.40% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, PBD is up 10.25% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, PBD compounded at +2.67% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -7.33% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.3% for PBD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBD charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBD currently yields 1.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PBD and VTI share 19 holdings out of 2874 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBD or VTI?
PBD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PBD or VTI?
Over the past year PBD returned +36.40% vs +23.31% for VTI, so PBD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PBD annualized -1.09% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PBD or VTI?
PBD has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PBD -79.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PBD and VTI?
PBD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PBD and VTI?
PBD and VTI share 19 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2874 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBD or VTI?
PBD yields 1.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.