PBD vs VYM
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PBD or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PBD led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PBD is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $185M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.71% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 124 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.94% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.03%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.95% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.53% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.3% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,761 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.1%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (19.3 years).
PBD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.3 years both funds cover.
PBD vs VYM Performance
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBD returned +17.03% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PBD is up 3.94% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, PBD compounded at +3.95% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -7.53% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.60% annualized vs -1.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 14.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.3% for PBD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBD charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBD currently yields 1.71% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of PBD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings PBD also owns.
PBD and VYM share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in PBD and 557 in VYM, against full books of 124 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 525 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PBD (96.9% of the fund), and 26 for PBD that do not appear in VYM (21.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBD and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBD or VYM?
PBD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBD or VYM?
Over the past year PBD returned +17.03% vs +15.34% for VYM, so PBD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), PBD annualized -1.39% vs +6.60% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBD or VYM?
PBD has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 14.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PBD -79.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PBD and VYM?
PBD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBD and VYM?
3.1% of PBD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings PBD also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in PBD and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBD or VYM?
PBD yields 1.71% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PBD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PBD led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PBD is less concentrated, with 13.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.