PBD vs VXUS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PBD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $186M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +9.77% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.80% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.33% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.62% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PBD vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBD returned +35.80% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, PBD is up 9.77% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, PBD compounded at +2.33% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -7.62% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.3% for PBD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBD charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBD currently yields 1.55% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PBD and VXUS share 60 holdings out of 7911 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBD or VXUS?
PBD has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PBD or VXUS?
Over the past year PBD returned +35.80% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so PBD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PBD annualized -1.11% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PBD or VXUS?
PBD has been the more volatile fund at 29.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PBD -79.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PBD and VXUS?
PBD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PBD and VXUS?
PBD and VXUS share 60 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7911 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBD or VXUS?
PBD yields 1.55% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.