PBOT vs SCHD

PBOT vs SCHD

Which is better, PBOT or SCHD?

All Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns (1Y): PBOTLess Concentrated: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPBOTSCHD
Expense Ratio0.70%0.06%Best
AUM$14M$112.2B
Dividend Yield0.08%3.13%
Holdings52103
YTD Return+30.18%Best+27.56%
1Y Return+32.94%Best+30.29%
3Y Return (annualized)-+16.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.23%
Top 10 Weight44.3%41.5%Best
Fund FamilyPictet Asset Management Ltd. (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleAll Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 15, 2025Oct 20, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PBOT vs SCHD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PBOT vs SCHD Performance

Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PBOT returned +32.94% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, PBOT is up 30.18% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PBOT charges 0.70% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $6 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBOT currently yields 0.08% against 3.13% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 50 holdings in PBOT and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in PBOT and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 52 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PBOT (99.9% of the fund), and 39 for PBOT that do not appear in SCHD (79.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of PBOT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

PBOTSCHD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PBOT or SCHD?

PBOT has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, PBOT or SCHD?

Over the past year PBOT returned +32.94% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so PBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, PBOT or SCHD?

PBOT yields 0.08% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHD better than PBOT?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.