IVV vs PBOT

IVV vs PBOT

Which is better, IVV or PBOT?

Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): PBOTLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPBOT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.70%
AUM$886.7B$14M
Dividend Yield1.10%0.08%
Holdings50852
YTD Return+13.39%+30.18%Best
1Y Return+20.08%+32.94%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+21.29%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.88%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best44.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendAll Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 15, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs PBOT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs PBOT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while PBOT returned +32.94%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 30.18% for PBOT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PBOT charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.08% for PBOT.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in PBOT22.6%
PBOT already in IVV56.4%

22.6% of IVV's money is in holdings PBOT also owns. 56.4% of PBOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

26 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in PBOT, against full books of 508 and 52.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 13 positions for PBOT that do not appear in our book for IVV (23.4% of the fund), and 471 for IVV that do not appear in PBOT (76.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PBOTDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.98%4.01%3.97%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.98%7.40%4.42%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A3.19%5.54%2.35%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc0.44%3.87%3.43%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A0.32%3.50%3.18%
KLACKla Corp0.38%3.26%2.88%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity0.24%2.80%2.56%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.94%0.99%0.95%
NOWServicenow, Inc0.18%2.73%2.55%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.51%1.28%0.23%

56.4% of PBOT is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVPBOT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PBOT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PBOT charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or PBOT?

Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +32.94% for PBOT, so PBOT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PBOT?

56.4% of PBOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 56.4% of PBOT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in PBOT.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PBOT?

IVV yields 1.10% while PBOT yields 0.08%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PBOT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. PBOT led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.