PBOT vs VOO
Pictet AI & Automation ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PBOT or VOO?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBOT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 104 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +9.70%Best | +8.52% |
| 1Y Return | +9.85% | +10.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.0% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,254 | $11,312Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.4% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1.1 years).
PBOT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
PBOT vs VOO Performance
Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) is an ETF from Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PBOT returned +9.85% while VOO returned +10.96%. Year to date, PBOT is up 9.70% versus a gain of 8.52% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.0% compared with 13.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for PBOT and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBOT charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBOT currently yields 0.07% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
56.7% of PBOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.3% of VOO's money is in holdings PBOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in PBOT and 506 in VOO, against full books of 104 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PBOT (69.7% of the fund), and 11 for PBOT that do not appear in VOO (24.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PBOT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.05% | 8.39% | 4.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.38% | 5.78% | 2.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.81% | 3.07% | 1.74% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.60% | 2.54% | 2.06% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 2.43% | 0.29% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc. | 4.42% | 0.49% | 3.93% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.22% | 0.41% | 3.81% |
| AMATApplied Material | 3.73% | 0.62% | 3.11% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.71% | 1.52% | 1.19% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 2.95% | 0.29% | 2.66% |
56.7% of PBOT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBOT or VOO?
PBOT has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PBOT or VOO?
Over the past year PBOT returned +9.85% vs +10.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), PBOT annualized +11.34% vs +11.86% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PBOT or VOO?
PBOT has been the more volatile fund at 33.0% annualized versus 13.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PBOT -24.9% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both PBOT and VOO?
PBOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PBOT and VOO?
56.7% of PBOT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.3% of VOO's is in holdings PBOT also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in PBOT and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBOT or VOO?
PBOT yields 0.07% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PBOT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.