PCCE vs QQQ
Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PCCE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -3.77% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.92% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iMGP Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 14, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PCCE vs QQQ Performance
Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE) is a ETF from iMGP Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PCCE returned +1.92% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, PCCE is down 3.77% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.2% for PCCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.4% for PCCE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PCCE charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PCCE currently yields 2.41% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PCCE and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 138 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PCCE or QQQ?
PCCE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PCCE or QQQ?
Over the past year PCCE returned +1.92% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PCCE annualized +13.65% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PCCE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.2% for PCCE. Worst drawdown: PCCE -26.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PCCE and QQQ?
PCCE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PCCE and QQQ?
PCCE and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 138 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PCCE or QQQ?
PCCE yields 2.41% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so PCCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.