PDBA vs VTI
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PDBA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $307M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.17% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.21% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.40% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.78% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
PDBA vs VTI Performance
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PDBA returned +6.40% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, PDBA is up 8.21% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, PDBA compounded at +13.78% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, PDBA has the edge at +11.33% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 10.9% for PDBA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for PDBA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PDBA charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PDBA currently yields 3.17% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PDBA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PDBA or VTI?
PDBA has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PDBA or VTI?
Over the past year PDBA returned +6.40% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PDBA annualized +11.33% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PDBA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 10.9% for PDBA. Worst drawdown: PDBA -12.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PDBA and VTI?
PDBA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PDBA and VTI?
PDBA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PDBA or VTI?
PDBA yields 3.17% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PDBA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.