PDBC vs VOO
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PDBC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PDBC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.3B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +34.86% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +42.68% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.65% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.98% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PDBC vs VOO Performance
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PDBC returned +42.68% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, PDBC is up 34.86% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, PDBC compounded at +11.65% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.98% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PDBC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.5% for PDBC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PDBC charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PDBC currently yields 3.20% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VOO?
PDBC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PDBC or VOO?
Over the past year PDBC returned +42.68% vs +22.62% for VOO, so PDBC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), PDBC annualized +4.03% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PDBC or VOO?
PDBC has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PDBC -49.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PDBC and VOO?
PDBC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PDBC and VOO?
PDBC and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PDBC or VOO?
PDBC yields 3.20% while VOO yields 1.09%, so PDBC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.