PFN vs VTI
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PFN or VTI?
Diversified Sectoral Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PFN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $686M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.61% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 513 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -5.47% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.87% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.88% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.4% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,525 | $17,908Best |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Diversified Sectoral Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 29, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2004 to Sep 18, 2026 (21.9 years).
PFN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PFN vs VTI Performance
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) is an ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PFN returned -3.87% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, PFN is down 5.47% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, PFN compounded at +11.39% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.88% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.58% annualized vs -2.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PFN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.4% for PFN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PFN charges 1.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PFN currently yields 12.61% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 23 holdings in PFN and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 9.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. That is not enough of PFN to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 304 days apart, PFN as of Sep 30, 2025 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
5 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in PFN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 513 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PFN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PFN or VTI?
PFN has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $126 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PFN or VTI?
Over the past year PFN returned -3.87% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), PFN annualized -2.24% vs +9.58% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PFN or VTI?
PFN has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PFN -83.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PFN and VTI?
PFN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, PFN or VTI?
PFN yields 12.61% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PFN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PFN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.